WSJ.com - Bloggers Debate Miers
My reaction is I don't like Miers at all. She's not qualified and she's a Bush crony. I agree with the Liberal Oasis take. What is up with Harry Reid?
WSJ.com - Bloggers Debate Miers: "Here's a roundup of what bloggers and others are saying online."
posted by Victor Laszlo @ 10/04/2005
6 comments
6 Comments:
What's going on? Seems like I'm having a lot of trouble following posts. I can't follow this one either - get an error page. Anyone else having similar problems?
Yes. It does not work for me either. Lazlo, lay off the cough syrup and fix those links.
Uh, Imp....I couldn't follow your link either
Ok try them now whiners (refreshing the browser may be necessary). I think it was a problem with Blogger. As if this blog doesn't have enough problems without dead links. At least it roused you guys to comment.
Look, Bush said he knows what is in her heart. Isn't that enough? Ok, well the short answer is: No. The long answer is Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
It never ceases to amaze me that these types of juvenile, myopic decisions are still reviewed by the MSM seriously. Is there no one out there who can honestly go on the nightly news and say this is a monumental mistake that misrepresents the intentions of the nominating process?
Check out George Will:
"It is not important that she be confirmed because there is no evidence that she is among the leading lights of American jurisprudence, or that she possesses talents commensurate with the Supreme Court's tasks. The president's "argument" for her amounts to: Trust me. There is no reason to, for several reasons." Although I disagree with him as he gets on his money=political speech kick but for more see:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/04/AR2005100400954.html
Post a Comment
<< Home